by Eric Hoffer
“HATRED is the MOST ACCESSIBLE and COMPREHENSIVE of all the UNIFYING AGENTS…
Mass movements can rise and spread without belief in a god, BUT NEVER WITHOUT a BELIEF in a DEVIL.”
~ Eric Hoffer, The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements
Eric Hoffer (1898 – 1983) was an American moral and social philosopher who worked for more than twenty years as longshoremen in San Francisco.
The author of ten books, he was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 1983. His first book, The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements (1951), is a work in social psychology which discusses the psychological causes of FANATICISM. It is widely considered a classic.
The first lines of Hoffer’s book clearly state its purpose:
This book deals with some PECULIARITIES COMMON TO ALL MASS MOVEMENTS, be they religious movements, social revolutions or nationalist movements. It does not maintain that all movements are identical, butthat they share certain essential characteristicswhich give them a family likeness.
All mass movements generate in their adherents a readiness to die and a PROCLIVITY FOR UNITED ACTION …
All of them, irrespective of the doctrine they preach and the program they project, breed fanaticism, enthusiasm, fervent hope, hatred and intolerance; all of them are capable of releasing a powerful flow of activity in certain departments of life; all of them demand blind faith and single-hearted allegiance …
The assumption that mass movements have many traits in common does not imply that all movements are equally beneficent or poisonous.
The book passes no judgments, and expresses no preferences. It MERELY TRIES to EXPLAIN… (pp. xi-xiii)
Part 1 – The APPEAL of MASS MOVEMENTS
Hoffer says that mass movements BEGIN WHEN DISCONTENTED, FRUSTRATED, POWERLESS PEOPLE LOSE FAITH IN EXISTING INSTITUTIONS AND DEMAND CHANGE.
Feeling hopeless, such people participate in movements that allow them to BECOME PART of a LARGER COLLECTIVE. They become true believers in a mass movement that “appeals not to those intent on BOLSTERING AND ADVANCING A CHERISHED SELF, BUT TO THOSE WHO CRAVE TO BE RID OF AN UNWANTED SELF Because it can satisfy the passion for SELF-RENUNCIATION.” (p. 12)
Put another way, Hoffer says: “Faith in a holy CAUSE is to a considerable extent a SUBSTITUTE FOR the LOSS of FAITH in OURSELVES.”(p. 14)
Leaders inspire these movements, but the seedsof mass movements must already exist for the leaders to be successful. And while mass movements typically blend nationalist, political and religious ideas, …
THEY ALL COMPETE FOR ANGRY and/or MARGINALIZED PEOPLE.
PART 2 – The POTENTIAL CONVERTS
The destitute are not usually converts to mass movements; they are too busy trying to survive to become engaged.
But what Hoffer calls the “new poor,” those who previously had wealth or status but who believe they have now lost it, are potential converts.
Such people are RESENTFUL and BLAME OTHERS FOR THEIR PROBLEMS.
Mass movements also attract the PARTIALLY ASSIMILATED– those who feel ALIENATED from mainstream culture.
Others include MISFITS, OUTCASTS, ADOLESCENTS, and SINNERS, as well as the AMBITIOUS, SELFISH, IMPOTENT and BORED. What all converts all share is the feeling that their lives are meaningless and worthless.
A rising mass movement attracts and holds a following not by its doctrine and promises but by …
the REFUGE IT OFFERS from the ANXIETIES, BARRENNESS, and MEANINGLESSNESS of an INDIVIDUAL EXISTENCE.
It cures the poignantly FRUSTRATED NOT by CONFERRING ON THEM an ABSOLUTE TRUTH OR REMEDYING the DIFFICULTIES and ABUSES WHICH MADE THEIR LIVES MISERABLE, …
BUT by FREEING THEM FROM THEIR INEFFECTUAL SELVES– and it does this by enfolding and absorbing them into a closely knit and exultant corporate whole. (p. 41)
Hoffer emphasizes that creative people—those who experience creative flow — aren’t usually attracted to mass movements.
Creativity provides INNER JOY which both acts as an ANTIDOTE to the FRUSTRATION with EXTERNAL HARDSHIPS.
Creativity also RELIEVES BOREDOM, a major CAUSE of mass movements:
There is perhaps no more reliable indicator of a society’s ripeness for a mass movement than the PREVALENCE of UNRELIEVED BOREDOM.
In almost all the descriptions of the periods preceding the rise of mass movements there is reference to vast ennui; and in their earliest stages mass movements are more likely to find sympathizers and support among the BORED than among the EXPLOITED and OPPRESSED.
To a deliberate fomenter of mass upheavals, the report that people are BORED still should be at least as encouraging as that they are suffering from intolerable economic or political abuses. (pp. 51-52)
PART 3 – UNITED ACTION and SELF-SACRIFICE
Mass movements demand of their followers a “TOTAL SURRENDER of a DISTINCT SELF.” (p. 117) Thus a follower identifies as “a MEMBER of a CERTAIN TRIBE OR FAMILY.” (p. 62)
Furthermore, mass movements DENIGRATE and “LOATHE the PRESENT.” (p. 74)
By REGARDING THE MODERN WORLD AS WORTHLESS, the movement inspires a BATTLE AGAINST IT.
What surprises one, when listening to the frustrated as the DECRY the PRESENT and all its works,
… is the ENORMOUS JOY THEY DERIVE from DOING SO.
Such delight cannot come from the mere venting of a grievance.
There must be SOMETHING MORE — and there is.
By expiating upon the incurable baseness and vileness of the times, the frustrated soften their feeling of FAILURE and ISOLATION … (p. 75)
Mass movements also PROMOTE FAITH OVER REASON and serve as “fact-proof screens between the faithful and …
the REALITIES of the WORLD.” (p. 79)
The effectiveness of a doctrine does not come from its meaning but from its certitude… presented as the embodiment of the one and only truth.
If a doctrine is not unintelligible, it has to be VAGUE; and if neither unintelligible nor vague, …
it has to be UNVERIFIABLE.
One has to get to heaven or the distant future to determine the truth of an effective doctrine… simple words are made pregnant with meaning and made to look like symbols in a secret message.
There is thus an illiterate air about the most literate true believer. (pp. 80-81).
SO BELIEVERS IGNORE TRUTHS that CONTRADICT THEIR FERVENT BELIEFS, but this hides the fact that …
… the fanatic is PERPETUALLY INCOMPLETE and INSECURE.
He cannot generate self-assurance out of his individual sources… but finds it only by clinging passionately to whatever support he happens to embrace.
The passionate attachment is the essence of his BLIND devotion and religiosity, and he sees in it the sources of all virtue and strength …
He sacrifices his life to prove his worth …
The fanatic cannot be weaned away from his cause by an appeal to reason or his moral sense.
He FEARS compromise and cannot be persuaded to qualify the certitude and righteousness of his holy cause. (p. 85).
Thus the doctrines of the mass movement must not be questioned– they are regarded with certitude – and they are spread through “persuasion, coercion, and proselytization.”
Persuasion works best on those already sympathetic to the doctrines, but it must be vague enough to allow “the frustrated to … hear the echo of their own musings in … impassioned double talk.” (p. 106)
Hoffer quotes Nazi propagandist Joseph Goebbels: “a sharp sword must always stand behind propaganda if it is to be really effective.” (p. 106)
The urge to proselytize comes not from a deeply held belief in the truth of doctrine but from an urge of the fanatic to “strengthen his OWN faith by converting OTHERS.”(p. 110)
Moreover, mass movements NEED an OBJECT of HATE WHICH UNIFIES BELIEVERS,
and “the ideal devil is a foreigner.” (p. 93)
Mass movements NEED a DEVIL.
But in reality, the “HATRED of a true believer is actually …
a DISGUISED SELF-LOATHING …”
and “the fanatic is PERPETUALLY INCOMPLETE and insecure.” (p. 85)
Through their fanatical action and personal sacrifice, the fanatic tries to give their life meaning.
PART 4 – BEGINNING and END
Hoffer states that THREE PERSONALITY TYPES typically lead mass movements: “men of WORDS”,“FANATICS”, and “practical men of ACTION.”
In the BEGINNING: “men of words” lead the movements.
Men of words try to “discredit the prevailing creeds” and creates a “hunger for faith” which is then fed by “doctrines and slogans of the new faith.” (p. 140) Slowly followers emerge.
THEN FANATICS TAKE OVER.
Fanatics don’t find solace in literature, philosophy or art.
INSTEAD, THEY are CHARACTERIZED by VICIOUSNESS, the URGE to DESTROY, and the PERPETUAL STRUGGLE for POWER.
But after mass movements TRANSFORMthe social order, the INSECURITY of THEIR FOLLOWERS IS NOT AMELIORATED.
At this point, the “practical men of action” take overand try to lead the new orderby further controlling their followers.
In the END MASS MOVEMENTS that SUCCEED OFTEN BRING ABOUT a SOCIAL ORDER WORSE than the PREVIOUS ONE.
(This was one of Will Durant’s findings in The Lessons of History.) As Hoffer puts it near the end of his work:
“ALL MASS MOVEMENTS… irrespective of the doctrine they preach and the program they PROJECT, …
BREED FANATICISM, ENTHUSIASM, FERVENT HOPE, HATRED, and INTOLERANCE.” (p. 141)